Thoughts that matter

November 6, 2012

 

We need to question normative ways of thinking about sex and gender they say.

Maybe just like we are blind to the normative way of thinking about matter. How we have trusted it to be what it is, always ready to be used in which way we please and tell us what we have always been told. Matter having a masculine or a feminine touch is a classic. Why don’t we use stonewalls in a nursery? Wouldn’t the caveman in us like to recognise the stone? How do we feel, what happens to the way we think if suddenly our choice of matter works against us?

What news can matter tell us?

/Hanna Wikström

Reading:

Judith Butler, ‘Bodies that Matter’, in Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex, London: Routledge, 1993.

Elizabeth Grosz, ‘Feminism, Materialism, and Freedom’, in Diana Coole and Samantha Frost, eds, New Materialisms: Ontology, Agency, and Politics, Durham and London: Duke University Press, 2010.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

<span>%d</span> bloggers like this: